Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch reviewers

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: ๏̯͡๏ Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch reviewers
Date: 2010-10-02 00:07:25
Message-ID: 4CA677BD.3030901@2ndquadrant.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-rrreviewers
๏̯͡๏ Guido Barosio wrote:
> I've already translated the Patch review process page, and I have it
> available where it belongs: our wiki
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Como_colaborar_con_PostgreSQL:_Revisi%C3%B3n_de_Patches
>
> The text has been translated but I am missing some styling and links
> that appear in the original document. Can I have an extra pair of eyes
> on this?
>   

This is all fixed now, but it's at a new URL:  
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch/es

Note that you if you visit the English 
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch , you'll see a link to 
the Spanish one.  In order for that all to work, the translated version 
must have the exact same name as the original, followed by a slash and 
the country code.  See 
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Template:Languages for a list of valid 
country codes.

If you want to translate another page like this, here is what I would 
recommend doing:

1) Look at the English version
2) Click on "Edit"
3) Copy all of the text in that version to your clipboard
4) Create a new page using the naming suggested above (English named 
followed by /es for all Spanish ones).
5) Paste the original text in.  This will get you all of the hyperlinks 
and the formatting.
6) Translate the text section at a time.
7) At the top, add something that looks like this:

{{Languages|Reviewing a Patch}}

Where the name of the English version is used, to say what this is a 
translation of.    I just wrote a summary of the above at a new page 
named http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Wiki:Language_policy

In addition to the hyperlinks being missing, there were also two forms 
of formatting issue with the one you did that you'd have avoided if you 
followed this approach:

A) The section headers in the original were marked with "==", the ones 
you did weren't
B) You made the lists by pasting in a bullet character and then adding 
<br> to the end of each line.  If you just start each list line with "*" 
instead, you don't have to do all that.

It only took me a few minutes to clean this all up so no problem for me, 
it's just that this would have made things easier for you--no need to do 
all that <br> stuff for example.

-- 
Greg Smith, 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support  www.2ndQuadrant.us
Author, "PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance"    Pre-ordering at:
https://www.packtpub.com/postgresql-9-0-high-performance/book


In response to

Responses

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:From: ๏̯͡๏ Guido BarosioDate: 2010-10-02 00:26:16
Subject: Re: Patch reviewers
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2010-10-01 23:00:11
Subject: Re: Patch reviewers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group