Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> You do realize that to be able to guarantee zero data loss, the
> master will have to stop committing new transactions if the
> streaming stops for any reason, like a network glitch. Maybe
> that's a tradeoff you want, but I'm asking because that point
> isn't clear to many people.
Yeah, I get that. I do think the quorum approach or some simplified
special case of it would be important for us -- possibly even a
requirement -- for that reason.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2010-09-30 14:32:26|
|Subject: Re: Standby registration|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2010-09-30 14:24:29|
|Subject: Re: Using streaming replication as log archiving|