On 2010/09/28 14:08, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Satoshi Nagayasu's message of mar sep 28 00:06:19 -0400 2010:
>> On 2010/09/28 12:40, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Looking at this patch I cannot but wonder if this should be a table
>>> instead of a plain list.
>> What's happen if you run the patch command at top of the repository?
> Sorry, I didn't try applying it. I don't think there's anything wrong
> with the patch per se. I'm just saying that maybe this page needs more
> significant SGML markup hacking.
I see. Yes, at first, I thought it, too.
However, at this time, I think SGML hack is not necessary right now,
because the important thing is to fix several missing definitions,
So, I want to hear from others on this issue before starting SGML hack
(such as "create a table instead of a list").
If markup hack is necessary for this time, I'm ready to go.
NAGAYASU Satoshi <satoshi(dot)nagayasu(at)gmail(dot)com>
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Satoshi Nagayasu||Date: 2010-09-28 10:01:52|
|Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG Documentation Improvement (re-post)|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-09-28 06:46:21|
|Subject: Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual |
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Nimesh Satam||Date: 2010-09-28 10:01:13|
|Subject: Clean up of archived Xlogs in postgres-9.|
|Previous:||From: Mike Christensen||Date: 2010-09-28 07:58:34|
|Subject: Re: Query to get the "next available" unique suffix for a name|