Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 1.12.1?

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 1.12.1?
Date: 2010-09-27 17:23:57
Message-ID: 4CA0D32D.2010606@lelarge.info (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
Le 27/09/2010 18:59, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> Le 27/09/2010 18:20, Dave Page a écrit :
>>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>>> Le 27/09/2010 17:10, Dave Page a écrit :
>>>>> We're building PostgreSQL 9.0.1 on Friday. Do we want to push out a
>>>>> pgAdmin update to coincide?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could be interesting to get the 6 bugfixes out. See
>>>> http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/query?status=closed&group=resolution&milestone=1.12.1
>>>> for details.
>>>>
>>>> Just looking at the CHANGELOG. Grmbl, I don't find the fixes in the
>>>> CHANGELOG file. I must have forgotten to update the file. Should I do it
>>>> afterwards?
>>>
>>> Yes please!
>>>
>>
>> Done.
> 
> OK, I'll look at wrapping 1.12.1 on Thursday.
> 

Great, thanks.


-- 
Guillaume
 http://www.postgresql.fr
 http://dalibo.com

In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2010-09-27 21:31:36
Subject: ctlCombobox SetEditable to false on Linux
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-09-27 16:59:51
Subject: Re: 1.12.1?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group