From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improving prep_buildtree used in VPATH builds |
Date: | 2010-09-27 15:15:31 |
Message-ID: | 4CA0B513.3070500@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/27/2010 10:39 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>> On 09/27/2010 10:11 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> What should be the value of 'Message-ID for original patch' ?
>>>> the URL:
>>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg01837.php
>>>> or the ID: AANLkTinw0HL+jQmrtwXC9Y2tqhcfHFgFekxyyfYGvQrB(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com
>>> The latter.
>>>
>> Could this perhaps be made clearer on the page, perhaps with an example? It
>> confused me recently too.
> Can you suggest something more specific?
>
Well, it could say something like:
The Message-ID can be found in the headers of the relevant email to
the pgsql-hackers mailing list, and also in the mailing list
archives at http://archives.postgresql.org. It looks something like
this (the format varies somewhat depending on the sender's Mail User
Agent): AANLkTinw0HL+jQmrtwXC9Y2tqhcfHFgFekxyyfYGvQrB(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com
That would certainly have given me, and I suspect Gurjeet, enough clue.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-27 15:15:58 | Re: Improving prep_buildtree used in VPATH builds |
Previous Message | Marios Vodas | 2010-09-27 15:13:12 | Re: gist access methods parameter types |