From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Thom Brown" <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-docs" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Primary Key index |
Date: | 2010-08-26 19:16:50 |
Message-ID: | 4C7677520200002500034C80@gw.wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> Looks good. Do we usually got into fine details such as the name
> of the index? They'll see the index name returned when they
> create the table or add the constraint anyway, and if they missed
> it they only need to do a "\dt tablename" to find out what it was.
Hmmm... Perhaps that is overkill. It seemed like a good idea at
the time, but I'm not inclined to argue about it if it seems too
detailed to you. Revised patch attached.
-Kevin
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
constraint-indexes-2.patch | text/plain | 2.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-08-26 19:19:05 | Re: Primary Key index |
Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2010-08-26 18:52:44 | Re: Primary Key index |