| From: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, "Sergio A(dot) Kessler" <sergiokessler(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Version Numbering |
| Date: | 2010-08-25 14:17:42 |
| Message-ID: | 4C752606.1000702@bluegap.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 08/21/2010 10:11 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> We changed 8.5 to 9.0 explicitly because doing so was good marketing,
That's exactly how I see this as well. The current scheme allows for
some flexibility for marketing purposes while still being
self-consistent and logical in numbering.
<sarcasm> And it allows us to have heated debates about whether or not
the next release is worth a major version bump. </sarcasm>
Regards
Markus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-25 14:18:38 | Re: EXPLAIN doesn't show the actual function expression for FunctionScan |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-25 14:15:22 | Re: Deadlock bug |