At the close of the 2010-07 CommitFest, the numbers were:
 
72 patches were submitted
 3 patches were withdrawn (deleted) by their authors
14 patches were moved to CommitFest 2010-09
--
55 patches in CommitFest 2010-07
--
 3 committed to 9.0
--
52 patches for 9.1
--
 1 rejected
20 returned with feedback
31 committed for 9.1
 
When we hit the end of the allotted time, I moved the last two
patches to the next CF, for want of a better idea for disposition. 
One is "Ready for Committer" with an author who is a committer.  The
other is my WiP patch for serializable transactions -- there's a lot
to review and the reviewer had unexpected demands on his time during
the CF; he said he'll continue work on that outside the CF.
 
-Kevin
 
 
At the end of week four:
 
> 72 patches were submitted
>  3 patches were withdrawn (deleted) by their authors
> 12 patches were moved to CommitFest 2010-09
> --
> 57 patches in CommitFest 2010-07
> --
>  3 committed to 9.0
> --
> 54 patches for 9.1
> --
>  1 rejected
> 18 returned with feedback
> 28 committed for 9.1
> --
> 47 disposed
> --
>  7 pending
>  2 ready for committer
> --
>  5 will still need reviewer attention
>  1 waiting on author to respond to review
> --
>  4 patches need review now and have a reviewer assigned

In response to

• CommitFest 2010-07 week four progress report at 2010-08-12 15:43:06 from Kevin Grittner

Responses

• Re: [RRR] CommitFest 2010-07 final report at 2010-09-13 11:44:38 from Thom Brown

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Steven Schlansker	Date: 2010-08-18 23:11:31
	Subject: COPY FROM/TO losing a single byte of a multibyte UTF-8 sequence
Previous:	From: A.M.	Date: 2010-08-18 21:33:57
	Subject: Re: Progress indication prototype

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:	From: Pavel Stehule	Date: 2010-08-19 10:59:33
	Subject: wip: functions median and percentile
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2010-08-12 18:20:49
	Subject: Re: CommitFest 2010-07 week four progress report