| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
| Cc: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PGDG |
| Date: | 2010-08-08 18:38:00 |
| Message-ID: | 4C5EF988.8090104@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> Well, the term 'contributor' certainly leaves room for interpretation.
> My main contribution consists of a somewhat external project
> (Postgres-R). I strongly hope that counts as well.
It's somewhat vague on purpose. "Contributor" is almost impossible to
define in the abstract (you keep running into corner cases) but easy to
evaluate on a case-by-case basis. Heck, when we evalualate the changes
to the contributor list every year it's like a 7-factor test.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-08-08 19:08:45 | Help with Skype for press contacting |
| Previous Message | Markus Wanner | 2010-08-07 06:43:13 | Re: PGDG |