On 8/3/2010 4:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> However, most of the cases that seem of interest so far are in fairly
> small, stable functions. Would it be reasonable to attach a "checked
> for overflow problems" label to these functions as a whole?
This should work great. I'll get my clang hacker to start working on it.
I see that pgsql has support already in place to def out attributes when
non-GCC ocmpilers are used.
Just to be clear we're talking about putting something like this in your
Pick whatever name you like for this attribute, it doesn't matter to us.
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Mark Kirkwood||Date: 2010-08-03 23:29:23|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5595: Documentation is not installs from VPATH build.|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-08-03 22:08:22|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5592: list of integer undefined behaviors |