Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3
Date: 2010-07-27 18:36:21
Message-ID: 4C4F2725.5030603@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>   
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-users/2010-May/026654.html
>>     
>
> It's not obvious that there's an unresolved issue here; downthread
> there's some indication this might be an environment problem?
>
> http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-users/2010-May/026658.html
>
>   

No, I have just reproduced this with a totally vanilla environment.

I think PostGIS probably needs to patch their makefile(s).

cheers

andrew

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: James RobinsonDate: 2010-07-27 19:07:28
Subject: ALTER TABLE ... DISABLE TRIGGER vs. AccessExclusiveLock
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2010-07-27 18:17:43
Subject: Re: do we need to postpone beta4?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group