| From: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronous replication |
| Date: | 2010-07-26 10:48:16 |
| Message-ID: | 4C4D67F0.5010301@cs.helsinki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/26/10 1:44 PM +0300, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Yeb Havinga<yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I wasn't entirely clear. My suggestion was to have only
>>
>> acknowledge_commit = {no|recv|fsync|replay}
>>
>> instead of
>>
>> replication_mode = {async|recv|fsync|replay}
>
> Okay, I'll change the patch accordingly.
For what it's worth, I think replication_mode is a lot clearer.
Acknowledge_commit sounds like it would do something similar to
asynchronous_commit.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2010-07-26 10:58:31 | Re: gincostestimate |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-07-26 10:44:46 | Re: Synchronous replication |