Re: [PERFORM] Using more tha one index per table

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Using more tha one index per table
Date: 2010-07-22 08:35:44
Message-ID: 4C4802E0.50704@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-performance

On 22/07/10 03:27, Greg Smith wrote:
> Steve Atkins wrote:
>> If http://postgresql.org/docs/9.0/* were to 302 redirect to
>> http://postgresql.org/docs/current/* while 9.0 is the current release
>> (and similarly for 9.1 and so on) I suspect we'd find many more links
>> to current and fewer links to specific versions after a year or two.
>
> True, but this would leave people with no way to bookmark a permanent
> link to whatever is the current version, which will represent a
> regression for how some people want the site to work.

Having a quick look at the website, a simple change might be to have a
large "CURRENT MANUALS" link above all the versioned links. That should
help substantially.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Wultsch 2010-07-22 09:09:21 Re: [PERFORM] Using more tha one index per table
Previous Message Satoshi Nagayasu 2010-07-22 06:35:43 Re: ECPG Documentation Improvement

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philippe Rimbault 2010-07-22 08:57:58 Re: Strange explain on partitioned tables
Previous Message A. Kretschmer 2010-07-22 08:16:37 Re: why index is not working in < operation?