Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Buildfarm + Git tryouts

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Buildfarm + Git tryouts
Date: 2010-07-05 18:12:47
Message-ID: 4C32209F.2000008@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Chris Browne's message of lun jul 05 12:33:49 -0400 2010:
>
>   
>> 3.  Some problems checking status.
>>
>> i) Status Line: 491 bad ts parameter - [timestamp omitted] is in the future
>>
>> I know my clock's reasonable - ntp is reporting I'm within 0.25s of
>> some stratum 2 nodes.  Is it possible that the buildfarm server is
>> ill-synced?
>>     
>
> I asked around and was told that the server is in sync currently.  It
> has been known to be out of sync before; if this problem still comes up,
> maybe there's a software bug or something.
>
>   


This discussion really belongs on pgbuildfarm-members, I think.

I have added a small fudge factor to the time test - let's see if that 
changes things.

cheers

andrew



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2010-07-05 19:14:45
Subject: Re: logistics for beta3
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-07-05 18:08:07
Subject: Re: t_self as system column

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group