Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chris <rfusca(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2
Date: 2010-06-25 19:09:23
Message-ID: 4C24FEE3.4090506@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> You could argue it either way. The number of beta testers with
> plpython3 installations is probably very small, so I'm kinda leaning to
> just changing the code without a catversion bump. OTOH, if we want to
> encourage testing of pg_upgrade ...

FWIW, the last bump has led to a lot of testing of pgupgrade.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-06-25 19:15:59 Re: Admission Control
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-06-25 19:07:16 Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2