Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: System tables screwed up? (WAS requested shared memory size overflows size_t)

From: Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: System tables screwed up? (WAS requested shared memory size overflows size_t)
Date: 2010-06-24 23:24:44
Message-ID: 4C23E93C.7010504@emolecules.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On 6/24/10 4:19 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Craig James's message of jue jun 24 19:03:00 -0400 2010:
>
>> select relname, pg_relation_size(relname) from pg_class
>>           where pg_get_userbyid(relowner) = 'emol_warehouse_1'
>>           and relname not like 'pg_%'
>>           order by pg_relation_size(relname) desc;
>> ERROR:  relation "rownum_temp" does not exist
>>
>> emol_warehouse_1=>  select relname from pg_class where relname = 'rownum_temp';
>>          relname
>> ----------------------
>>    rownum_temp
>> (1 row)
>
> What's the full row?  I'd just add a "WHERE relkind = 'r'" to the above
> query anyway.

Thanks, in fact that works.  But my concern is that these are system tables and system functions and yet they seem to be confused.  I've used this query dozens of times and never seen this behavior before.  It makes me really nervous...

Craig

P.S. Sorry I got the Subject wrong the first time by hitting the REPLY key mindlessly, I've changed it now.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-06-24 23:55:01
Subject: Re: System tables screwed up? (WAS requested shared memory size overflows size_t)
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-06-24 23:19:25
Subject: Re: requested shared memory size overflows size_t

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group