Tom Lane wrote:
>> And how would it be per data-type?
> Well, there'd be two kinds of enums, just as you were saying before.
> I'm not sure how we'd expose that to users exactly, or whether there
> could be provisions for switching a type's behavior after creation.
I'd be a whole lot happier if we didn't have to do that. I've been
trying to wrack my brain for some clever way to avoid it (so far without
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: firstname.lastname@example.org||Date: 2010-06-19 08:57:19|
|Subject: Re: About tapes|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-06-18 22:53:20|
|Subject: Re: extensible enum types |