On 10/06/10 17:38, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I think my logic needs a tiny piece of adjustment, to ignore the
> timeline segment of the file name.
I'm not sure you should ignore it. Presumably anything in an older
timeline is indeed not required anymore and can be removed, and anything
in a newer timeline... how did it get there? Seems safer not remove it.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-06-10 15:21:10|
|Subject: Re: Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4? |
|Previous:||From: Mark Wong||Date: 2010-06-10 15:17:19|
|Subject: Re: fix use of posix_fadvise in xlog.c|