Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [TEST REPORT]

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-testers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [TEST REPORT]
Date: 2010-05-22 15:18:29
Message-ID: 4BF7F5C5.7000007@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-testers
> *[Results]:* dump/restore (using 9.0beta1 dump against 8.4 database and
> restore to 9.0beta1) worked flawlessly, as does zabbix. Performance is
> comparable to 8.4 (no problems with the system inserting and deleting 50
> rows per second 24*7). Now running 10 days - originally installed on
> CentOS 5.4, meanwhile upgraded to CentOS 5.5, still works flawlessly.

Thanks for this, performance comparison is especially useful.

-- 
                                   -- Josh Berkus
                                      PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                      http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

pgsql-testers by date

Next:From: Glen BarberDate: 2010-06-07 15:26:40
Subject: Misplaced pg_upgrade_support.so ?
Previous:From: Marcel GsteigerDate: 2010-05-21 20:01:35
Subject: [TEST REPORT]

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group