Re: "Compact" and "complete" SQL

From: Erwin Brandstetter <brandstetter(at)falter(dot)at>
To: dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org
Cc: guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "Compact" and "complete" SQL
Date: 2010-05-10 14:20:19
Message-ID: 4BE81623.4010708@falter.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On 07.05.2010 21:21, dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org wrote:
> Sorry - missed that. I generally prefer to only include SQL DDL for
> things that are non-default.

I generally agree. I see the "complete" variant as an option. The
"compact" (non-default SQL DDL) version is what would make my work easier.
However, at the time being we have a mixture. How would you define
"non-default"?

Regards
Erwin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message svn 2010-05-10 15:07:52 SVN Commit by guillaume: r8352 - in branches/REL-1_10_0_PATCHES/pgadmin3: . pgadmin/frm
Previous Message Dave Page 2010-05-10 12:30:41 Re: Quiet logs for frmStatus