It reviewing the output, I'm thinking this is a bug in my test
framework, not in ecpg. Do you agree?
On 5/7/10 3:00 PM, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> could you compile ecpg with debugging enabled and then run your test case under
> gdb? A run under valgrind might help too. This bug shows some memory
> corruption, so I need to figure out where exatly this happens.
> Alternatively a small test case with which I can reproduce the problem on my
> system is an option too.
> Thanks a lot for your effort.
In response to
pgsql-testers by date
|Next:||From: Michael Meskes||Date: 2010-05-07 19:41:03|
|Subject: Re: Possible 9.0 bug|
|Previous:||From: Paul Anderson||Date: 2010-05-07 19:23:04|
|Subject: Re: Glibc error using ecpg|