Re: Redundant statements

On 30.04.2010 00:40, guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info wrote:
> Le 30/04/2010 00:35, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
>
>> On 29.04.2010 18:48, guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info wrote:
>>
>>> Le 29/04/2010 17:50, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>> Le 29/04/2010 17:28, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 29.04.2010 15:21, guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you think of it? Should I create a ticket?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, I would like to have a better handling of the "SET STORAGE"
>>>>>> statement. So, yes, you can create a ticket on that, without being too
>>>>>> specific on the solution, which still needs some talk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> So we agree on "SET STORAGE". I'll create a ticket on that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Yeah. I also found how to detect the "initial" value of the storage
>>>> (column typstorage in pg_catalog.pg_type). So I'll work on this right
>>>> now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Fixed. I can provide you a new pgAdmin3.exe quite easily if you want.
>>>
>>>
>> Cool. If you provide me with a new pgAdmin3.exe I will use it for tests.
>>
> On it.
>
>
>> We are moving in on a point release v1.10.3, aren't we? I found 21
>> resolved bugs tagged "1.10.3" in trac - compared to 9 for v1.10.2. So we
>> might call it early alpha-testing?
>>
>>
> Not right now. Dave is working on getting out beta 1 for pgAdmin 1.12. I
> don't think he has the time to prepare a new 1.10 minor release, and I'm
> not sure this is the perfect timing for it. But I hope we'll have one
> before 1.12 is final.
>

Either way, fine with me. As a bugfix release, 1.10.3 wouldn't need a
lot of testing, I guess.

Good night!
Erwin