Re: Vacuum cancels autovacuum error message confusing?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuum cancels autovacuum error message confusing?
Date: 2010-04-20 23:07:32
Message-ID: 4BCE33B4.3080704@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> That said, I'm not wedded to that message wording; feel free to propose
> something better.

Yeah, I'm looking to see if we can determine the difference between an
autovac which was cancelled by vacuum and one which was cancelled for
another reason.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-04-20 23:13:18 Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-04-20 23:06:20 Should database = all in pg_hba.conf match a replication connection?