From: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | SpinLockAcquire question |
Date: | 2010-04-20 13:46:26 |
Message-ID: | 4BCDB032.8090403@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
is there a danger in using SpinLockAcquire() in
a signal handler? I mean if e.g. a spinlock is already
taken by the process and a signal comes that's handler
wants to execute SpinLockAcquire() again, does it
lock up or simply increases the lock counter?
Thanks in advance,
Zoltán Böszörményi
--
Bible has answers for everything. Proof:
"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more
than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology.
"May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
http://www.postgresql.at/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-04-20 13:47:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-20 13:42:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements |