| From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pavelbaros <baros(dot)p(at)seznam(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: GSoC - proposal - Materialized Views in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2010-04-13 05:20:08 |
| Message-ID: | 4BC3FF08.2050401@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> I just worry about any feature which doesn't get as far as a
> user-visible implementation. If someone doesn't do the rest of the
> parts soon, such features tend to atrophy because nobody is using them.
>
While they're limited, there are complexly viable prototype quality
implementations possible here without a large amount of work to get them
started. I'm not worried too much about this feature being unused. As
I was just reminded when assembling an page on the wiki about it:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Materalized_Views it's currently ranked
#1--by a large margin--on the UserVoice feature request survey that
Peter kicked off.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.us
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Murali M. Krishna | 2010-04-13 05:32:11 | Re: debugger question |
| Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2010-04-13 04:39:35 | Re: ECPG check variables hidden by locals v2 |