Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: GSoC - proposal - Materialized Views in PostgreSQL

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pavelbaros <baros(dot)p(at)seznam(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GSoC - proposal - Materialized Views in PostgreSQL
Date: 2010-04-12 21:46:20
Message-ID: 4BC394AC.4060508@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg,

> I'm not saying someone can't jump right into (3), using the current
> implementations for (1) and (2) that are floating around out there.  I
> just think it would end up wasting a fair amount of work on prototypes
> that don't work quite the same way as the eventual fully integrated
> version.  You certainly can start working on (3) without a fully fleshed
> out implementation of (2), I don't know that it makes sense to work on
> before (1) though.

What would be the use case for (1) by itself?


-- 
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2010-04-12 22:46:46
Subject: Re: GSoC - proposal - Materialized Views in PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-04-12 20:03:09
Subject: Re: GSoC - proposal - Materialized Views in PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group