From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Server crash with older tzload library |
Date: | 2010-03-12 07:40:31 |
Message-ID: | 4B99EFEF.4070206@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> No, Jeevan is talking about tzcode, not tzdata. The zoneinfo library is
>> split into two parts, we update the data part at each release, but we
>> don't sync up our code with upstream code changes regularly.
>
> It strikes me that maybe we are putting ourselves at risk by blithely
> pushing tzdata updates into back branches without also pushing tzcode
> updates.
I believe they're designed to be compatible both ways, I remember that
the 64-bit changes in particular were done in such a way that new tzdata
files work with older tzcode versions. I don't know if anyone else is
testing various combinations, though, so it probably would be good to
update tzcode anyway.
> However, doing this would mean updating the back branches for
> 64bit tzdata, which is not a small change. Heikki, do you remember how
> much that patch affected stuff outside the tzcode files proper?
There was no changes outside tzcode files.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2010-03-12 07:43:57 | Re: gothic_moth, codlin_moth failures on REL8_2_STABLE |
Previous Message | Takahiro Itagaki | 2010-03-12 06:52:07 | Re: [GENERAL] trouble with to_char('L') |