Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4
Date: 2010-03-11 01:12:44
Message-ID: 4B98438C.7090406@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackers 
On 3/10/10 3:26 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> OK, that's enough to not remove it. I was aware of more negative
> thoughts and conscious of my own feelings about it being a kluge.

Well, it *is* a kludge, but it may be the best one for people who want
to use HS/SR to support web applications.  So I think we should work on
making it less kludgy.

Ultimately we're going to need publish-XID-to-master, but that's not
realistic for 9.0.

--Josh Berkus

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-03-11 01:39:37
Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-03-11 01:09:04
Subject: Re: Warning about invalid .pgpass passwords

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-03-11 08:30:36
Subject: Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-03-10 23:26:06
Subject: Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group