From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: machine-readable pg_controldata? |
Date: | 2010-03-04 22:33:48 |
Message-ID: | 4B90354C.7060303@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/04/2010 02:09 PM, Joshua Tolley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:54:15PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> 2010/3/4 Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>:
>>> pg_controldata --catalog_version
>>>
>>> Even better would be the ability to get everything which is in
>>> pg_controldata currently as part of a system view in a running
>>> PostgreSQL; I can get most of them, but certainly not all.
>>
>> +1 for having all the information available from inside the backend,
>> if that's technically possible (which I assume it should be)
>
> I'd love to see pg_config's various bits of information in there as well. I
> just haven't gotten around to writing it. But +1 from me, FWIW.
I agree something like this would be useful -- maybe I'll try to come up
with some round tuits...
Joe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Christensen | 2010-03-04 23:12:55 | Re: Explicit psqlrc |
Previous Message | Joshua Tolley | 2010-03-04 22:09:53 | Re: machine-readable pg_controldata? |