Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
Date: 2010-03-02 19:03:14
Message-ID: 4B8D60F2.2040301@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 3/2/10 10:30 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Right now you can't choose "master bloat", but you can choose the other
> two.  I think that is acceptable for 9.0, assuming the other two don't
> have the problems that Tom foresees.

Actually, if vacuum_defer_cleanup_age can be used, "master bloat" is an
option.  Hopefully I'll get some time for serious testing this weekend.

--Josh Berkus

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2010-03-02 20:11:00
Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-03-02 18:34:33
Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group