Lee Hachadoorian wrote:
> I work with state labor data which is reported to us in the form
> industry, year, quarter1, quarter2, quarter3, quarter4
> where each quarter represents an employment count. Obviously, this can
> be normalized to
> industry, year, quarter, employment
> Can anyone comment on, or point to me to an article or discussion
> regarding, why one would use an array column instead of normalizing
> the data? That is, would there be any benefit to storing it as
> industry int, year smallint, employment int[ ]
> where the last column would be a four element array with data for the
> four quarters.
> Lee Hachadoorian
> PhD Student, Geography
> Program in Earth & Environmental Sciences
> CUNY Graduate Center
If you want to do that, I'd recommend:
That way it is more clear, easier to query, uses less space and you wont
end up with employment data for the 5th quarter or something odd like that.
Arrays are great for working with your data during the query process.
But you should generally avoid using them to store your data on disk.
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Chander Ganesan||Date: 2010-03-02 18:09:33|
|Subject: Re: The OS Command for pg_hotbackup -- Use lvmsnapshot instead
of tar cvzf|
|Previous:||From: Peter Hunsberger||Date: 2010-03-02 17:57:00|
|Subject: Re: Array columns vs normalized table|