Albe Laurenz wrote:
> As demonstrated here:
> it can happen that you end up with a corrupt database
> if you use PITR to recover past a hardware failure.
> It seems that unique constraints are not verified during
> WAL replay.
> Is that intentional or an oversight that should be fixed?
It's intentional. WAL replay works at a lower level, it has no knowledge
of operators or the concept of uniqueness.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Ivan Sergio Borgonovo||Date: 2010-03-02 10:06:16|
|Subject: Re: dedebugging and a functions that just don't work on
|Previous:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2010-03-02 09:49:31|
|Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)|