On 2/28/10 7:12 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> However, I'd still like to hear from someone with the requisite
>> > technical knowledge whether capturing and retrying the current query in
>> > a query cancel is even possible.
> I'm not sure who you want to hear from here, but I think that's a dead end.
"dead end" as in "too hard to implement"? Or for some other reason?
It's undeniable that auto-retry would be better from a user's
perspective than a user-visible cancel. So if it's *reasonable* to
implement, I think we should be working on it. I'm also very puzzled as
to why nobody else wants to even discuss it; it's like some wierd blackout.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jaime Casanova||Date: 2010-03-01 22:36:08|
|Subject: Re: function side effects|
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2010-03-01 21:49:53|
|Subject: Re: scheduler in core|