Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
Date: 2010-03-01 19:35:37
Message-ID: 4B8C1709.20007@kaltenbrunner.cc (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> Completely aside from that, how many users are going to be happy with a
>> slave server which is constantly 5 minutes behind?
>>
> 
> Uhm, well all the ones who are happy with our current warm standby
> setup for one?
> 
> And all the ones who are looking for a standby reporting server rather
> than a high availability DR site.
> 
> For what it's worth Oracle has an option to have your standby
> intentionally hold back n minutes behind and I've seen that set to 5
> minutes.

yeah a lot of people are doing that intentionally...


Stefan

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-03-01 19:43:13
Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2010-03-01 19:32:24
Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group