Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Testing of parallel restore with current snapshot

From: Andrea Suisani <sickpig(at)opinioni(dot)net>
To: Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Testing of parallel restore with current snapshot
Date: 2010-03-01 09:13:42
Message-ID: 4B8B8546.5030201@opinioni.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 27/02/2010 07:52, Gokulakannan Somasundaram wrote:
> Tom,
>      I just took the patch, but it seems to be in binary format. Can you send
> me the patch to me?

gunzip shuould do the trick

> Thanks,
> Gokul.
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>  wrote:
>
>> Josh Berkus<josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>  writes:
>>> Tom,
>>>> Is anyone interested enough to try it if I code it?
>>
>>> If you're patient for results, sure.  I seem to be doing a customer
>>> migration or upgrade every week now, so it wouldn't take me long to have
>>> a test subject with a fairly complex database.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Yeb HavingaDate: 2010-03-01 09:55:46
Subject: Re: C libpq frontend library fetchsize
Previous:From: Takahiro ItagakiDate: 2010-03-01 08:47:40
Subject: Re: C libpq frontend library fetchsize

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group