Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
Date: 2010-02-27 00:21:11
Message-ID: 4B886577.4020808@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> That is exactly the core idea I was trying to suggest in my rambling
> message.  Just that small additional bit of information transmitted and
> published to the master via that route, and it's possible to optimize
> this problem in a way not available now.  And it's a way that I believe
> will feel more natural to some users who may not be well served by any
> of the existing tuning possibilities.

Well, if both you and Tom think it would be relatively easy (or at least
easier that continuing to pursue query cancel troubleshooting), then
please start coding it.  It was always a possible approach, we just
collectively thought that query cancel would be easier.

--Josh Berkus


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael GlaesemannDate: 2010-02-27 00:30:16
Subject: Re: Alpha4 Available Now
Previous:From: Michael GlaesemannDate: 2010-02-27 00:12:51
Subject: Re: Correcting Error message

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group