On 2/26/10 6:57 AM, Richard Huxton wrote:
> Can we not wait to cancel the transaction until *any* new lock is
> attempted though? That should protect all the single-statement
> long-running transactions that are already underway. Aggregates etc.
I like this approach. Is it fragile in some non-obvious way?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-02-26 19:05:52|
|Subject: Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables |
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2010-02-26 19:01:30|
|Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and
Streaming Replication integration|