Re: Time travel on the buildfarm

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Time travel on the buildfarm
Date: 2010-02-22 14:03:42
Message-ID: 4B828EBE.90109@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> It is currently 22:21:59 EST here. At 21:50 I committed a fix to
> copydir.c that cleaned up a couple of thinkos by Greg, including
> a misspelling that had been making all the builds fail for several
> hours. I went to see if any of the buildfarm had gone green yet,
> and indeed half a dozen members had --- but they are all claiming
> to be using snapshots between 00:44:53 and 00:51:20 old. Unless
> the cvs mirror can see into the future, that's a lie. I'm not
> sure how the ages on the buildfarm show_status.pl page are generated,
> but I'm betting somebody's local clock is off.
>
>
>

Thanks for the report.

The buildfarm server is currently reporting a time 25 minutes too fast.
I have previously discussed with the server administrators the necessity
of running an NTP daemon on the machine, but I will do so again.

This is one area where git (or almost anything but CVS) would server us
better. With git or even Subversion, we would report the tree version as
well as the timestamp.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-02-22 14:38:34 Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-02-22 12:30:19 Re: Streaming replication and pg_xlogfile_name()