Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
> Michael Meskes írta:
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:28:00PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
>>> I was trying to stress the *beta* status. Maybe someone into NetBSD might be
>>> interested in reporting this as a bug. At least it behaves different to all
>>> other archs we have.
>> Hmm, it seems the patch didn't work. Back to the drawing board.
> I hope the amd64 version of NetBSD 5.0.2 behaves similarly,
> I can only try it as a VM guest...
NetBSD 5.0.2/x86_64 passed all both the main and the ECPG
"make check" tests. The BETA might have had a bug or
NetBSD/MIPS has some quirks I can't solve. Now what?
On a sidenote, this machine fails for the 8.4 STABLE tree, too,
in the main "make check"...
Is this buildfarm member for detecting bugs in the already
obsolete NetBSD 5.0 BETA, or what? The final 5.0 and
two bugfix releases are already out for a while. The owner
of that particular machine should upgrade.
Bible has answers for everything. Proof:
"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more
than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology.
"May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tim Bunce||Date: 2010-02-17 12:03:26|
|Subject: Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14|
|Previous:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2010-02-17 10:27:38|
|Subject: Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken|