Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14

From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14
Date: 2010-02-16 05:10:00
Message-ID: 4B7A28A8.6000900@ak.jp.nec.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
(2010/02/14 13:34), Robert Haas wrote:
> * Fix large object support in pg_dump.  I think this is just waiting
> for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct.  I've been
> meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe
> someone else would like to take a look?  This is an open item, so we
> should really try to deal with it.

Do I have anything I can work on this right now?

Because I'll be unavailable at the next week, I'd like to fix up it
within this week, if possible.
-- 
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-02-16 05:19:15
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4566: pg_stop_backup() reports incorrect STOP WAL LOCATION
Previous:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2010-02-16 04:06:27
Subject: libpq PGresult object and encoding

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group