Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [FWD] About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Leonardo F <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [FWD] About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Date: 2010-02-15 08:47:18
Message-ID: 4B790A16.2080903@2ndquadrant.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Leonardo F wrote:
> Could at least the message:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg00766.php
> be added to the TODO page, under 
> "Improve CLUSTER performance by sorting to reduce
> random I/O" ?
> It would be sad if the patch got lost...

You should read http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch and 
follow the instructions there.  As outlined in the "Submission timing" 
section, you're asking about something during the wrong time to be doing 
so--that's why you're not getting any real feedback.  Add your patch to 
the next CommitFest by linking to your message at 
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/ and it won't get lost--it will get 
assigned a reviewer at the time when the time comes to look at 
completely new patches again.

-- 
Greg Smith    2ndQuadrant   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com  www.2ndQuadrant.com


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-02-15 08:50:08
Subject: Re: idle in txn query cancellation
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-02-15 08:47:09
Subject: Re: idle in txn query cancellation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group