Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14
Date: 2010-02-14 18:33:16
Message-ID: 4B7841EC.2010001@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> I will look at this one.  It'd be nice to get it in if at all possible,
> because the existing listen/notify infrastructure won't play very nicely
> with HS --- eg, inspecting pg_listener on the slave might yield the
> false impression that some of the slave-side backends had active LISTENs
> because of chance matches of PID.

It'll also serve a major need for integrating PostgreSQL with caching
infrastructures.  So it's not just an "insider" feature.

--Josh Berkus


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-02-14 18:47:41
Subject: Re: Listen / Notify - what to do when the queue is full
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-02-14 18:08:47
Subject: Re: knngist patch support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group