Alvaro Herrera írta:
> Boszormenyi Zoltan escribió:
>> Robert Haas írta:
>>> OK, please change it.
>> New patch is attached with the discussed changes.
> This looks all wrong. PORTAL_ONE_SELECT is now being passed through
Where do you read that? The code in my patch reads:
* If we have not yet run the command,
do so, storing its
! * results in the portal's tuplestore.
Do this only for the
! * PORTAL_ONE_RETURNING and
! if ((portal->strategy !=
PORTAL_ONE_SELECT) && (!portal->holdStore))
So, PORTAL_ONE_SELECT doesn't run through FillPortalStore().
> which runs it to completion, whereas it was previously
> passed via PortalRunSelect first, which has different semantics
> regarding the "count" arg.
> Also, even if that weren't wrong, FillPortalStore states at its header
> comment that it is only used for the other two cases (ONE_RETURNING and
> UTIL_SELECT), but now is being used for ONE_SELECT as well.
Bible has answers for everything. Proof:
"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more
than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology.
"May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2010-02-11 20:08:52|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove old-style VACUUM FULL
(which was known for a little while|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-02-11 19:58:01|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove old-style VACUUM FULL (which was known for a little while|