Alexey Klyukin wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>   
>> Alexey Klyukin wrote:
>>     
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> When developing pl/perlu functions common definitions and methods are often stored in external .pm modules. During deployment the modules should be installed somewhere in @INC to be reachable by the perl interpreter. However, installing the modules to a location outside of the PG installation makes it hard to have a consistent environment when running multiple PG versions on the same host. What do you think about defining a canonical place for pl/perlu .pm modules (i.e. PKGLIBDIR) and adding this location to @INC during the interpreter initialization ? Another idea is to allow a user to specify such location by adding a new custom GUC variable.
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>       
>> Why won't setting this in the new on_perl_init setting work? It's even included in to documented examples using the standard lib module: <http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/plperl-under-the-hood.html#PLPERL-CONFIG>
>>     
>
> The lack of support for SPI functions makes this hardly an adequate solution. I do have both modules and SPI calls in several pl/perlu functions.
>
>   


That has nothing to do with what you asked about, namely setting the 
include path. You can set the include path in on_perl_init with "use 
lib" and then "use" your modules in your plperlu functions, at which 
point SPI will be available.

cheers

andrew

In response to

• Re: a common place for pl/perlu modules at 2010-02-11 16:41:14 from Alexey Klyukin

Responses

• Re: a common place for pl/perlu modules at 2010-02-11 17:36:00 from Alexey Klyukin

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tollef Fog Heen	Date: 2010-02-11 17:08:03
	Subject: Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
Previous:	From: Heikki Linnakangas	Date: 2010-02-11 17:04:41
	Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL