Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL
Date: 2010-02-11 14:22:54
Message-ID: 4B7412BE.5030605@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-docspgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> Might it not be simpler to add a parameter onto pg_standby?
> We send %s to tell pg_standby the standby_mode of the server which is
> calling it so it can decide how to act in each case.

That would work too, but it doesn't seem any simpler to me. On the contrary.

-- 
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-02-11 14:38:40
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-02-11 14:17:48
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-02-11 14:31:55
Subject: Re: Bugs in b-tree dead page removal
Previous:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2010-02-11 14:19:14
Subject: Re: knngist patch support

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2010-02-11 14:29:50
Subject: pgsql: Generic implementation of red-black binary tree.
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-02-11 14:17:48
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group