Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've sometimes wondered why keepalives aren't the default for all
> TCP connections. They seem like they're usually a Good Thing
> (TM), but I wonder if we can think of any situations where someone
> might not want them?
I think it's insane not to use them at all, but there are valid use
cases for different timings. Personally, I'd be happy to see a
default of sending them if a connection is idle for two minutes, but
those people who create 2000 lightly used connections to the
database might feel differently.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Geoghegan||Date: 2010-02-11 16:33:35|
|Subject: Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-02-11 16:27:38|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove old-style VACUUM FULL (which was known for a little while |