On 2010-02-08 18:42 +0200, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Marko Tiikkaja
> <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> wrote:
>> On 2010-02-04 18:04 UTC+2, I wrote:
>>> While working on the docs, I noticed one problem with the patch itself:
>>> it doesn't handle multi-statement DO INSTEAD rules correctly. I'm going
>>> to submit a fix for that later.
>> Here's an updated patch. Only changes from the previous patch are
>> fixing the above issue and a regression test for it.
> - It appears that we pull out all of the DML statements first and run
> them in order, but I'm not sure that's the right thing to do.
> WITH x AS (INSERT ...), y AS (SELECT ...), z AS (INSERT ...) SELECT ...
> I would assume we would do x, CCI, do y, do z, CCI, do main query, but
> I don't think that's what this implements. The user might be
> surprised to find out that y sees the effects of z.
I've updated the patch according to what I said here:
I haven't done any extensive testing, but it seems to work in the most
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-02-10 14:46:21|
|Subject: Re: Some belated patch review for "Buffers" explain analyze patch |
|Previous:||From: Marko Tiikkaja||Date: 2010-02-10 14:42:16|
|Subject: Re: Writeable CTEs patch|