Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: review: More frame options in window functions

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: review: More frame options in window functions
Date: 2010-02-08 19:39:44
Message-ID: 4B706880.9090509@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2/8/10 11:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Given the lack of time remaining in this CF, I'm tempted to propose
> ripping out the RANGE support and just trying to get ROWS committed.
> That should be substantially less controversial from a semantic
> standpoint, and it still seems like a considerable improvement in
> functionality.

+1

--Josh Berkus

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Florian WeimerDate: 2010-02-08 19:50:37
Subject: Re: Confusion over Python drivers
Previous:From: Marko TiikkajaDate: 2010-02-08 19:30:03
Subject: Writeable CTEs and empty relations

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group