Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date: 2010-01-30 02:02:45
Message-ID: 4B639345.1060508@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> An actual plan here might look like "let's flip it before 9.1alpha1
> so we can get some alpha testing cycles on it" ...

"Hey, let's flip it in 9.1 CF 1, so that we can have some alpha testing
cycles on it."

;-)

--Josh Berkus

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-01-30 02:10:48 Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl UPDATE v3 [PATCH]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-30 02:01:12 Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings