Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date: 2010-01-29 23:56:03
Message-ID: 4B637593.6060103@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> We would have more than no-time-at-all to test it and fix any breakage.
> Just to start close to home, do you really trust either psql or pg_dump
> to be completely free of standard_conforming_strings issues?  How about
> JDBC or ODBC?  Python drivers?  PLs?

Oh, yeah.  I was just thinking about the direct user and DBA issues; of
course if there's additional potential breakage, we'll have to defer it.
 Too bad, it would have been a good time to break it from a user
perspective.

--Josh Berkus


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-01-29 23:59:52
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Previous:From: Andres FreundDate: 2010-01-29 23:15:08
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group